Well, viewing the cross would kill the vampire, so I don't know what
churches he could safely enter.  Also, he can only enter at night, so
further encummbrance (though not impossible to over come) to worship.

H.



-----Original Message-----
From: Garza, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:59 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Circumcision article link


Nit Picking here...  You are talking about Catholic Vampires (maybe
Episcopalian as well).  There are plenty of "Christian" religions that would
probably welcome vampires.... <G>

Jeff Garza

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:52 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Circumcision article link


You know me, always researching the practical applications. :) Of course, by
definition a religious Christian vampire can't exist either. Taking
communion or going to mass (requirements) would kill it automatically.

At 12:39 PM 4/12/02, you wrote:
>I'm glad you explained that, I didn't want to stick my neck out on that
>issue.
>;-)
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:42 AM
>> To: CF-Community
>> Subject: RE: Circumcision article link
>>
>>
>> No Jewish vampires either.
>> Yes, one can eat non-Kosher is their life depends on it but
>> vampires are by definition not alive so their life can't
>> depend on it. i.e. a vampire who's Jewish and religious has to starve.
>>
>> At 12:31 PM 4/12/02, you wrote:
>> >Gee, somehow I knew the Masai weren't Jewish
>> >;-)
>> >
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> >> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:31 AM
>> >> To: CF-Community
>> >> Subject: RE: Circumcision article link
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> At 12:19 PM 4/12/02, you wrote:
>> >> >thanks, not eating pork is always something i've wondered about.
>> >> >
>> >> >whats the exact religious reason?
>> >> Laws of ritual purity when dealing with what you eat. Land
>> >> animals have to have split hooves and chew their cud. Sea
>> >> animals have to have fins and scales. Birds of prey
>> >> (depending on claw configuration) are not allowed. Those are
>> >> the basics. Also, blood is not allowed.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >-----Original Message-----
>> >> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> >> >Sent: 12 April 2002 16:52
>> >> >To: CF-Community
>> >> >Subject: RE: Circumcision article link
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Pig is one of the animals specifically mentioned as being
>> >> not allowed. Even
>> >> >when I wasn't religious I didn't eat it (and I was just a
>> >> kid). Closest I've
>> >> >come is soy bacon. salty, but I love it. :)
>> >> >
>> >> >At 11:39 AM 4/12/02, you wrote:
>> >> >>so as far as your concerned it's a commandment not to eat pork?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>-----Original Message-----
>> >> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> >> >>Sent: 12 April 2002 16:40
>> >> >>To: CF-Community
>> >> >>Subject: Re: Circumcision article link
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Actually, a religious person (at least this one) looks at
>> >> it and says that
>> >> >>its a commandment and I'm doing it because its a
>> >> commandment. If science
>> >> >>says that the commandment has a physical effect, then fine
>> >> and good. The
>> >> >>physical effect is totally secondary to the spiritual effect. To
>> >> >>say that the commandment or every commandment was done
>> >> for a physical
>> >> >>reason such as health opens the door to denial of the root of
>> >> >>the commandment. Hey, not eating pork was because of
>> >> trichinosis. If we cook it
>> >> >>right then we wouldn't get the disease and we can now eat
>> >> it. Same for all
>> >> >>the other commandments. This is the rational of the reform
>> >> movement and a
>> >> >>rational rejected by religious Jews.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>At 03:51 AM 4/12/02, you wrote:
>> >> >>>It seems that much of the old testament law, such as
>> >> circumcision, what to
>> >> >>eat and not to eat, etc., has a good basis in what is
>> >> healthy, especailly
>> >> >>given the lack of sanitary conditions of the times.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>A religious person might argue that this is God making up
>> >> the lack of
>> >> >>science of the time to protect people. A non-believer might
>> >> argue that this
>> >> >>is wise people coming up religious law to mirror their own
>> >> observations
>> >> >>about what makes a person sick.  Either way, it
>> >> demonstrates a good deal of
>> >> >>wisdom in the old books.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>H.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
>> >> >>>from: "Braver, Ben" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> >>>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >>>date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 19:56:23 -0700
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>Found a link to the original article on circumcision &
>> >> risk of cervical
>> >> >>>>cancer - it's in the New England Journal of Medicine:
>> >> >>>>http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/346/15/1105
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>Apparently, the foreskin is particularly susceptible to
>> >> infection from
>> >> >HPV
>> >> >>-
>> >> >>>>human papilloma virus - which is linked to cervical cancer.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>-Ben
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>


______________________________________________________________________
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to