On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know it wasn't but what I wrote says the same thing. The first clause is > junk, and it's a personal right. Heller found this, you are wrong.
Didn't you just accuse me of not caring what the wording of the constitution was? lol As for Heller, I already acknowledged that the Supreme Court has found an individual right. So that is the current law of the land. But it is also the first ruling on the matter and will likely be revisited in the future. Do you think that every decision the Supreme Court has ever made, every constitutional interpretation, is correct and makes everyone else "wrong"? I was not arguing against the interpretation of the 2nd amendment defining an individual right to bear arms. You are jumping down people's throats without bothering to read what they said. All I said was that the 2nd amendment is not as clearly written as the first. Chill out a bit and deal with what I actually wrote rather than making me out to be tearing down the constitution. Cheers, Judah ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:280052 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
