Well, they've killed on commands "attributed" to him. That's the problem. But then again, the entire departure of Christianity from its Jewish roots was "attributed" to him after the fact.
At 11:58 AM 4/15/02, you wrote: >Actually, if you ask some one to kill some one, even in jest, and the person >does it, you are accessory to murder. There's a long legal tradition >supporting that, and rightfully so. > >On the religious question, however, I don't know any passage in the Bible >where Jesus says to kill people. > >H. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 8:41 AM >To: CF-Community >Subject: RE: Religious Jews (was: Circumcision article link) > > >> >> exactly! Anyone, be they person, spirit or the divine must >> take responsibility for the actions done at their command or >> word. We had a debate a while back about a commander taking >> responsibility for the actions of those under his command. >> Same thing here. If a person goes and kills X number of >> people at the command or teaching of someone then that >> someone must take responsibility for their words. >> > >And to take this even more away from religion - it's absolute bull crap >to say that if I ask you to kill someone, and you do, it's my fault. >Unless we are talking about children here, at the end of the day, no one >is responsible for your actions but you. It may be wrong for me to ask >you to kill someone, but if you pull the trigger, you are the murderer, >not I. Shoot, didn't we (as a world) say this excuse wasn't satisfactory >for the Nazis? (ie, 'I was just following orders.'?) > >-rc > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
