> the organization speaks in the name of someone else, then > that someone else had better do something to set them right. > We prosecuted the Nazis who pulled the triggers AND those who > gave the commands. In no place have I said that those > performing the actions are exempt. I simply said that those > who told them what actions to take bear (beer?) responsibility. > (side question, which beer is it?) >
Again - an interesting interpertation, but I take an absolutist view - no matter WHO tells me what to do, at the end of the day, I'm responsible. So, lets just agree to disagree here. However, I owe you a beer for telling you were full of bull crap. Of course, you are, but that's a side issue. ;) -rc ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
