The climate cycle is only a very small part of the overall picture, so dwelling only on that answers no questions.
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > No, I have been saying all along that the climate has been cyclical and that > what we are seeign now could jut sbe a natural part of that cycle. My > reasons for saying we need to expand beyond the 150 years (or more) of data > is so that we can see the cycles that have been taking place and where we > currently are in those cycles. > > I never once claimed the that the research about ancient trends was > 'useless'. Please show where I said that. Don't tell me to look at research > that you pointed to and then tell me I cannot use that research as a basis > for my point. If anything, the research you pointed to tends to prove my > point, which was climate change is cyclical, and that we cannot be certain > that the warming we are seeing now is based on humans or the natural cycle. > I never made any other claims. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:283441 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
