> Michael wrote: > Gruss, I'd like to apologise for calling you names. > It's unprofessional regardless of how emotional your posts have made me. >
Not a problem - if we're going to be passionate about an issue, this is the one to be passionate about. I do, however, think there's a communication problem. Having experience with a thing is great, no problems there, and good data points, etc. But my point all along has been simple: just because it works there doesn't mean it works here. I'm not saying won't work, I'm only saying that it's a real stretch to think it will. The article I posted is much more eloquent at explaining why than I. And (warning, I'm going to be blunt as is my custom) your experience isn't that unique, and at the end of the day patient experience doesn't tell us anything about rearchitecting an operational healthcare system. Maybe greenfield, but not a legacy one. Which is why cobol programmers still make high dough. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:289019 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
