> Scott wrote: > cases, in the world according to Gruss, the minority can and should be told, > if you don't like it, go elsewhere. >
Absolutely! That's called liberty, Scott. Freedom of choice. Revel in it! --- The answer to your "question" is this: companies - whether public or private - can pursue any policies they want in any way they want as long as those policies do not violate the law. Your scenario of a public company's voting to allow racist jokes is irrelevant on numerous grounds including, but not limited to: (1.) Only in the case of unions can a "vote" enforce a policy that may not be endorsed by management. Thus your comparison is irrelevant. (2.) If such a non-sanctioned vote where to take place, the outcome would not be binding. Thus your comparison is irrelevant. (3.) If management supported such a policy, that would violate federal law. Thus your comparison is irrelevant. I wasn't answering your question because I was hoping that my hints would indicate a teachable moment and you would use that opportunity to investigate why you were wrong. That hasn't happened, so I've indulged you with an explicit answer. You're welcome. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:293126 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
