But since you feel Muslims are incapable of living non-violent lives why do
you care who's in charge?
Don't you ultimately feel that _any_ Islamic party that's in charge is going
to be a threat to non-Muslims?

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Michael Dinowitz <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Concern about our fellow man isn't enough. How about concern that the
> world government of the UN is not helping ALL people, just some.
> Condemning one while ignoring another? How about how my representative
> to the world political stage is representing me. I mean, feck it.
> Innocent death means nothing, right? How about I'm concerned about how
> a repressive regime who has threatened their neighbors and is on the
> verge of getting nuclear weapons is acting and how people are treating
> it. Yeh, that sounds better than humans. Who cares about them, right?
>
> How is it inconsistent? Hamas is a terrorist group using it's own
> citizens as pawns/shields as they launch rockets into Israel. Israel
> is internationally lambasted when they try to stop the rockets. Israel
> has open and free elections and does not have the question of fraud
> that Iran has nor do they shoot unarmed protesters. Oh, and I don't
> want Iran to nuke Israel as they have been 'implying' for a while.
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Michael Grant<[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > This is probably going to come off all wrong... but feck it anyway.
> > Purely out of curiousity: Why exactly do _you_ care about the people of
> > Iran? It just seems kind of inconsistent considering your stance on
> > Isreal-Palestine.
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Michael Dinowitz <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Define humanitarian efforts in the face of humans being mowed down. Or
> >> is Iran (or china, and anyone else on the "human rights board")
> >> exempt?
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Scott Stroz<[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > The UN should stick to humanitarian efforts.  When it comes to
> actually
> >> > dealing with anything other than that, they are completely useless.
> All
> >> the
> >> > UN will do is speak to them sternly - and even then its not that
> stern.
> >> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Michael Dinowitz <
> >> > [email protected]> wrote
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:299016
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to