"Have you stopped beating your wife?" Your taking my opposition to Hamas, Hizballah and the governments who use and abuse their people as my stance on Muslims as a whole. Far from the truth. Most Iranians (to be specific here) have nothing against America, Israel, Jews, whoever. The government of Iran is the ones killing their own people and trying to foment hate for America, Israel, whoever.
Can an Islamic government work? As long as they treat their people right and don't attack other people, then no problem. On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Michael Grant<[email protected]> wrote: > > But since you feel Muslims are incapable of living non-violent lives why do > you care who's in charge? > Don't you ultimately feel that _any_ Islamic party that's in charge is going > to be a threat to non-Muslims? > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Michael Dinowitz < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Concern about our fellow man isn't enough. How about concern that the >> world government of the UN is not helping ALL people, just some. >> Condemning one while ignoring another? How about how my representative >> to the world political stage is representing me. I mean, feck it. >> Innocent death means nothing, right? How about I'm concerned about how >> a repressive regime who has threatened their neighbors and is on the >> verge of getting nuclear weapons is acting and how people are treating >> it. Yeh, that sounds better than humans. Who cares about them, right? >> >> How is it inconsistent? Hamas is a terrorist group using it's own >> citizens as pawns/shields as they launch rockets into Israel. Israel >> is internationally lambasted when they try to stop the rockets. Israel >> has open and free elections and does not have the question of fraud >> that Iran has nor do they shoot unarmed protesters. Oh, and I don't >> want Iran to nuke Israel as they have been 'implying' for a while. >> >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Michael Grant<[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > This is probably going to come off all wrong... but feck it anyway. >> > Purely out of curiousity: Why exactly do _you_ care about the people of >> > Iran? It just seems kind of inconsistent considering your stance on >> > Isreal-Palestine. >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Michael Dinowitz < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Define humanitarian efforts in the face of humans being mowed down. Or >> >> is Iran (or china, and anyone else on the "human rights board") >> >> exempt? >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Scott Stroz<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > The UN should stick to humanitarian efforts. When it comes to >> actually >> >> > dealing with anything other than that, they are completely useless. >> All >> >> the >> >> > UN will do is speak to them sternly - and even then its not that >> stern. >> >> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Michael Dinowitz < >> >> > [email protected]> wrote >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:299019 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
