Somehow I think the 'ground work' was laid for 50 some-odd years prior to GWB and Clinton. I think it's America's propensity towards manipulating the middle east that lead to the terror attacks and not any specific president or party.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Bruce Sorge <[email protected]> wrote: > > I dunno what changes he would have made. My point though is that the > ground was laid for an attack well before he came to office. 8 years of > placating terrorists and inappropriate responses, including Clinton's > little wag the dog experiment during the Lewinsky scandal. > > Gruss Gott wrote: > > > > The memo title 'bin laden determined to attack ...', along with the > > reams of other intel that the CIA was trying to get to Pres Bush and > > he ignored. And he was on a one month vacation just before we were > > hit. But we've covered all of that. > > > > I'm curious - let's say we'd been hit 18 months after election instead > > of 9. What big changes do you think Bush would've made? > > > > I mean after all, this is guy who went on a one month vacation 9 > > months after he was elected. Doesn't really seem like he was in a > > rush to do much > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:304225 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
