Given the evidence, I'd say there's as much evidence for invisible pink unicorns as there is for god. For instance, this statement makes as much sense as yours:
-- None taken, I agree, there is no absolute proof. However I do find good indications that there are Invisible Pink Unicorn, whereas I find no evidence that there is a God. Therefore I have no qualms deciding to accept one and toss out the other. -- Logically they are about the same. What you are doing is going well beyond logic and evidence into the fantastical realm of magical thinking. On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Mary Jo Sminkey <[email protected]> wrote: > >>No offense, but the same can be said of God > > None taken, I agree, there is no absolute proof. However I do find good > indications that there is a God, whereas I find no evidence that there are > invisible pink unicorns. Therefore I have no qualms deciding to accept one > and toss out the other. > > > -- Mary Jo > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:306392 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
