A person makes a statement that is supposedly true and in reality. That needs to be backed up by data.
I am not belittling anyone's beliefs here, just using a questioning method here to refine and clarify what they are. Someone says that such is true, I want to see the evidence. No real evidence no real truth. On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:07 AM, G Money <[email protected]> wrote: > > You rail like crazy when believers try to engage in the realm of science > with their theology. > > So why are engaging in the realm of theology with your science? > > What are you trying to prove? Belittling someone's cherished beliefs doesn't > do them, or you, or anyone...much good. Let it go. > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> Given the evidence, I'd say there's as much evidence for invisible >> pink unicorns as there is for god. For instance, this statement makes >> as much sense as yours: >> >> -- >> None taken, I agree, there is no absolute proof. However I do find >> good indications that there are Invisible Pink Unicorn, whereas I find >> no evidence that there is a God. Therefore I have no qualms deciding >> to accept one and toss out the other. >> -- >> >> Logically they are about the same. What you are doing is going well >> beyond logic and evidence into the fantastical realm of magical >> thinking. >> > > -- > Show a little faith there's magic in the night > You ain't a beauty but hey yer alright > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:306493 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
