You rail like crazy when believers try to engage in the realm of science with their theology.
So why are engaging in the realm of theology with your science? What are you trying to prove? Belittling someone's cherished beliefs doesn't do them, or you, or anyone...much good. Let it go. On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>wrote: > > Given the evidence, I'd say there's as much evidence for invisible > pink unicorns as there is for god. For instance, this statement makes > as much sense as yours: > > -- > None taken, I agree, there is no absolute proof. However I do find > good indications that there are Invisible Pink Unicorn, whereas I find > no evidence that there is a God. Therefore I have no qualms deciding > to accept one and toss out the other. > -- > > Logically they are about the same. What you are doing is going well > beyond logic and evidence into the fantastical realm of magical > thinking. > -- Show a little faith there's magic in the night You ain't a beauty but hey yer alright ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:306437 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
