Before I forget I cannot take credit for the pink unicorn idea, its a long held counter argument, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invisible_pink_unicorn
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > Given the evidence, I'd say there's as much evidence for invisible > pink unicorns as there is for god. For instance, this statement makes > as much sense as yours: > > -- > None taken, I agree, there is no absolute proof. However I do find > good indications that there are Invisible Pink Unicorn, whereas I find > no evidence that there is a God. Therefore I have no qualms deciding > to accept one and toss out the other. > -- > > Logically they are about the same. What you are doing is going well > beyond logic and evidence into the fantastical realm of magical > thinking. > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Mary Jo Sminkey <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >>>No offense, but the same can be said of God >> >> None taken, I agree, there is no absolute proof. However I do find good >> indications that there is a God, whereas I find no evidence that there are >> invisible pink unicorns. Therefore I have no qualms deciding to accept one >> and toss out the other. >> >> >> -- Mary Jo >> >> >> >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:306393 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
