On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Maureen  wrote:

>
> Could you provide a link to the data that indicates that the planet is
> cooling, and the credentials of those gathering and presenting said
> data?
>

Here is just one example, but it's irrelevant, all you need is a 5th grade
education to understand that the planet has been really hot and really cold
in the distant past and it had nothing to do with human activity.

http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/143573

THE scientific consensus that mankind has caused climate change was rocked
yesterday as a leading academic called it a “load of hot air underpinned by
fraud”.

Professor Ian Plimer condemned the climate
change<http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/search/climate%20change/>lobby as
“climate comrades” keeping the “gravy
train<http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/143632/DEBATE-Is-climate-change-a-con-to-raise-taxes->”
going.

In a controversial talk just days before the start of a climate
summit<http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/142903/Queen-opens-climate-change-summit>
attended
by world leaders in Copenhagen, Prof Plimer said Governments were treating
the public like “fools” and using climate change to increase taxes.

He said carbon dioxide has had no impact on temperature and that recent
warming was part of the natural cycle of climate stretching over ­billions
of years.

Prof Plimer - author of *Heaven and Earth: Global Warming, The Missing
Science* <http://www.quartetbooks.co.uk/heavenandearthminesite.html> - told
a London audience: “Climates always change. They always have and they always
will. They are driven by a number of factors that are random and cyclical.”

His comments came days after a scandal in climate-change research emerged
through the leak of emails from the world-leading research unit at the
University of East Anglia. They appeared to show that scientists had been
massaging data to prove that global warming was taking place

The Climate Research Unit also admitted getting rid of much of its raw
climate data, which means other scientists cannot check the subsequent
research. Last night the head of the CRU, Professor Phil Jones, said he
would stand down while an independent review took place.

Professor Plimer said climate change was caused by natural events such as
volcanic eruptions, the shifting of the Earth’s orbit and cosmic radiation.
He said: “Carbon dioxide levels have been up to 1,000 times higher in the
past. CO2 cannot be driving global warming now.

“In the past we have had rapid and significant climate change with
temperature changes greater than anything we are measuring today. They are
driven by processes that have been going on since the beginning of time.”

He cited periods of warming during the Roman Empire and in the Middle Ages –
when Vikings grew crops on Greenland – and cooler phases such as the Dark
Ages and the Little Ice Age from 1300 to 1850.

And he predicted that the next phase would cool the planet.

Climate change is widely blamed on the burning of fossil fuels which release
greenhouse gases such as CO2 into the atmosphere, where they trap the sun’s
heat.

The talks at Copenhagen are expected to find ways to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions globally.

But Professor Plimer, of Adelaide and Melbourne Universities, said that to
stop climate change Governments should find ways to prevent changes to the
Earth’s orbit and ocean currents and avoid explosions of supernovae in
space. Of the saga of the leaked emails, he said: “If you have to argue your
science by using
fraud<http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/142796/Climate-theme-to-dominate-summit>,
your science is not valid.”

The CRU’s Professor Jones has admitted some of the emails may have had
“poorly chosen words” and were sent in the “heat of the moment”. But he has
categorically denied manipulating data and said he stood by the science. And
yesterday he dismissed suggestions of a conspiracy to alter ­evidence to
support a theory of man-made global warming as “complete rubbish”.

But mining geology professor Plimer said there was a huge momentum behind
the climate-change lobby.

He suggested many scientists had a vested interest in promoting climate
change because it helped secure more funding for research. He said: “The
climate comrades are trying to keep the gravy train going. Governments are
also keen on putting their hands as deep as possible into our pockets.

“The average person has been talked down to. He has been treated like a
fool. Yet the average person has common sense.”

But Vicky Pope, head of Met Office Climate Change Advice, said: “We are
seeing changes in climate on a timescale we have not seen before.

“There clearly are natural variations. But the only way we can explain these
trends is when we include both man-made and natural changes to the climate.

“We have also seen declines in summer sea ice over the past 30 years,
glaciers retreating for 150 years, changing rainfall patterns and increases
in subsurface and surface ocean temperatures.”

And as the war of words between the rival camps intensified, leading
economist Lord Stern dismissed the sceptics as “muddled”.

Lord Stern, who produced a detailed report on the issue for the Government,
said evidence of ­climate change was “overwhelming”. He accepted that all
views should be heard but said the degree of ­scepticis

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308815
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to