On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Gruss G wrote: > > Now you might be right: this trend may indeed prove to be "common > cause" variation. But keep in mind we've got double the time period > confirmation of special cause. That's pretty strong, but certainly > not proof. > > We could do everything wrong and 100 years from now the planet could be an iceberg, or we could do everything right and 100 years from now the planet could be a hot-house. Or it could be the other way around. We have no way of knowing, and more importantly no way of controlling, the non-anthropogenic factors in climate change.
In other words, we're proposing to spend trillions of dollars to make a dent in the smallest of factors that influence our climate, and we're shamelessly selling the idea to the public on the totally false premise that it will magically "solve" global warming, as though sun spots, volcano eruptions, ocean currents or cloud formations will otherwise keep the planet exactly the same as it is now. Shysters one and all. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:309260 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
