Vague is right. Worldwide spending over the "next few decades" for all climate related items? But of course worded in your message as if the US was going to spend trillions in the next 15 minutes.
I am so tired of the spin and mis-information, on all these topics, from all sides. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Robert Munn <[email protected]> wrote: > Vague numbers from 1-5% of global output are mentioned in the Economist this > week if you pick up a copy. It has global warming on the cover. 1% is the > low number, but that would still be more than $100 billion a year for the US > - probably a lot more since we are the ones creating a lot of the CO2. > > The NYTimes says trillions right here. $10 trillion just in the next two > decades. Just in infrastructure. Who are they kidding? > > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/09/science/earth/09cost.html ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:309277 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
