gravity bong? Is *that* what happened that night? By the way, through some
magic I am not seeing Sam. Not filtering hims so, hmmm, I think Google
decided he is spam. Clever Google ;)

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:23 PM, denstar <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Sam wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:32 PM, denstar wrote:
> >>
> >> Personally, I'm curious about the motivation.
> >>
> >> Apparently it's money?  At least that's what Sam keeps pushing as
> >> motivation.  Guess these scientists would all get raises or something?
> >>  Is that how it works, Sam?
> >
> > All the <strike>skeptics</strike> deniers are in it for the money so
> > they say, why not the ???non-deniers? Or are they too pure?
>
> Because money that comes through the government isn't like money in,
> say, a corporation?  How exactly are they going to get these funds
> into their personal accounts?  You can't just give yourself a raise,
> and, um, profits?  Yeah, I just don't think it works like you seem to
> imply.
>
> >
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7078565/UN-climate-chiefs-research-institute-won-grants-after-flawed-predictions-on-glaciers.html
>
> So, what, the director gets to pocket the awesome amount of 3 mil?
> They get to take the money and do whatever they want with it, like
> giving themselves million dollar raises or some such?  Do they get
> million+ dollar parachutes, like some CEOs now, maybe?
>
> (For the love of money, eh?  An interesting thought pattern... does it
> reflect something? ;])
>
> Do you honestly believe their motivation is purely based on money?
>
> >
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703657604575005412584751830.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
>
> $541,184 for three years?  That's like what, 5 people making 36 grand
> a year?  Assuming it all goes to paychecks, which it don't.
>
> I thought you said "they" were making billions off this stuff?
>
> And a university that specializes in this area of research shouldn't
> get any more money?  Does the author even know how universities, and
> indeed, The System in general, works?  :)p
>
> > And we all know Hansen made millions
>
> I don't.
>
> Frankly, this whole spin about "scientists" using climate change to
> funnel billions into their private pocketbooks, seems [more than]
> sorta silly.
>
> It just doesn't work the way you're advocating it works (they say
> capitalism is all about the money, so we'll say science is all about
> the money!).
>
> There's more to life than dualism, dude.  It's rich, and lovely- not
> even close to black and white...
>
> You should come take a gander at the shades and gradients, they're swell!
>
> And you don't have to be high as a kite to see 'em.
>
>
>
> But I think you should get high as a kite.  You know, get some perspective.
>
> *denstar gives Sam a shotgun hit  (and Sam leans into it, so it's like
> a smooch too)
>
> If you keep talking trash about New Mexico, you'll get a hit off the
> gravity bong.
>
> 'cause I'm an asshole, you bad man.  :)
>
> |-)en
>
> --
> In sum, thought and reflection have been rendered thoroughly pointless
> by the circumstances in which modern men and women live and act.
> Jacques El
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311374
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to