Dana we agree on a great many things, and I agree that she was dumb to make it too easy.
However the best point yet has been (IMNSHO) tampering with someone's paper mail is a serious offense. Possibly even a real federal felony with PRISON time. Yet you don't even see this kid getting county time as being correct? You don't see yourself being biased because of who the target was in the least here? -----Original Message----- From: Dana [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 9:44 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty! ha, if your password is password you can expect all you like but... well. On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What Dana is saying is tantamount to saying that a woman who is raped >> has some 'contributory negligence' if she dresses provocatively. > > > > I think you are absolutely right. And I also agree you've taken it to the > nth degree, however I think it's a fair point. You can make your password > "password" and *should* have the same reasonable expectation of privacy as > someone who has a strong password. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317160 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
