P.S. Dana, I'm not trying to attack you. You seem a little sensitive to that so I thought I'd clarify. I simply want to know how far your argument might go as far as blaming the victim (or having the victim share responsibility) is concerned.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote: > Note the use of the double asterisk around the word "should." > > To build on Scott's point, and out of curiosity, how would your opinion > change if instead the statement was: > > A woman should be able to wear a micro-mini and a see through sheer top > that says "I like it rough" on the front and should have a reasonable > expectation of not being raped. > > Sure I realize there's a big difference between sexual assault and email > hacking, however in principle there's objective similarities. > > > > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> ha, if your password is password you can expect all you like but... well. >> >> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> What Dana is saying is tantamount to saying that a woman who is raped >> >> has some 'contributory negligence' if she dresses provocatively. >> > >> > >> > >> > I think you are absolutely right. And I also agree you've taken it to >> the >> > nth degree, however I think it's a fair point. You can make your >> password >> > "password" and *should* have the same reasonable expectation of privacy >> as >> > someone who has a strong password. >> > >> > >> > >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317167 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
