Note the use of the double asterisk around the word "should." To build on Scott's point, and out of curiosity, how would your opinion change if instead the statement was:
A woman should be able to wear a micro-mini and a see through sheer top that says "I like it rough" on the front and should have a reasonable expectation of not being raped. Sure I realize there's a big difference between sexual assault and email hacking, however in principle there's objective similarities. On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > > ha, if your password is password you can expect all you like but... well. > > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> What Dana is saying is tantamount to saying that a woman who is raped > >> has some 'contributory negligence' if she dresses provocatively. > > > > > > > > I think you are absolutely right. And I also agree you've taken it to the > > nth degree, however I think it's a fair point. You can make your password > > "password" and *should* have the same reasonable expectation of privacy > as > > someone who has a strong password. > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317165 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
