I am sensitive huh ;) I just applied for a network security job and Scott is trying to frame the conversation as Dana thinks it's ok to use our powers on the dark side if the target is right.
But ok since we are here now: If your hypothetical woman went to a frat party and lay down in the living room with her legs spread while fondling her breasts what do you think would happen? Would that be rape? Sure, if she passes out or at any point I don't wanna Is what she did wise? Is it a recommended course of actiom? Would you suggest it to your daughter, girlfriend or sister? Is it still rape? Would her behavior be a factor in the decision not to prosecute? You betcha. Would it still be rape? You betcha. Hopefully that makes things clearer. Sometimes the law is an ass. Sometimes people are just too stupid to breathe. Ask yourself how a teenager knew she used the account for government business. Had to have been a pretty long-standing habit. On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote: > > P.S. Dana, I'm not trying to attack you. You seem a little sensitive to that > so I thought I'd clarify. I simply want to know how far your argument might > go as far as blaming the victim (or having the victim share responsibility) > is concerned. > > > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Note the use of the double asterisk around the word "should." >> >> To build on Scott's point, and out of curiosity, how would your opinion >> change if instead the statement was: >> >> A woman should be able to wear a micro-mini and a see through sheer top >> that says "I like it rough" on the front and should have a reasonable >> expectation of not being raped. >> >> Sure I realize there's a big difference between sexual assault and email >> hacking, however in principle there's objective similarities. >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> ha, if your password is password you can expect all you like but... well. >>> >>> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >> What Dana is saying is tantamount to saying that a woman who is raped >>> >> has some 'contributory negligence' if she dresses provocatively. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > I think you are absolutely right. And I also agree you've taken it to >>> the >>> > nth degree, however I think it's a fair point. You can make your >>> password >>> > "password" and *should* have the same reasonable expectation of privacy >>> as >>> > someone who has a strong password. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317171 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
