Ok, so because there's a logical expectation of a crime occurring it somehow makes the crime ok?
Does a guy with a really punchable face (yes there is such a thing) not have the same reasonable expectation to not be assaulted? Or how about this one. You are at a rock concert. A woman is up on a guys shoulders. She flashes her sweater puppies at the band. Is it now ok for anyone that wants to grab her tits? On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Eric Roberts < [email protected]> wrote: > > I would disagree...if you make your password "password", you should expect > to be hacked. > > Eric > > -----Original Message----- > From: Medic [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 8:18 AM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty! > > > > What Dana is saying is tantamount to saying that a woman who is raped > > has some 'contributory negligence' if she dresses provocatively. > > > > I think you are absolutely right. And I also agree you've taken it to the > nth degree, however I think it's a fair point. You can make your password > "password" and *should* have the same reasonable expectation of privacy as > someone who has a strong password. > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317189 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
