wow...you even changed the argument mid-sentence there. You went from talking about 'knockback power' to 'knockdown power' - more Calvin-ball. Keep this up and I am gonna need a scorecard to keep track of your arguments.
Once again...some proof, please. Surely any one of the number of gun magazines would have articles on the magic gun that could knock the target back several feet with a bullet fired from said weapon. For the record, I am not debating the 'stopping power' of a .45, rather your claim that it will knock someone back several feet when hit with a bullet fired from one. On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Eric Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > > Because of its slowness it has more knockback power than something like a > 9mm and that is why many prefer it for its knockdown power. They know that > if they hit their target, it's not going to keep moving forward and > potentially cause harm. One or two hits from a .45 will do the trick, while > a round like a 9mm may require several (I have read about as many as 36 and > still surviving) hits before the target is dead or sufficiently stopped. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Judah McAuley [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 7:22 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment > > > A .45 is slow moving compared to other penetrating bullets. It is > still a penetrating bullet. A rubber bullet and a bean bag are meant > to not be penetrative. That is the big difference and is exactly what > your quote is discussing, hence why they talk about bean bags and > rubber bullets being non-penetrative and used for knockdowns. You see > a pattern here? > > Judah > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Eric Roberts > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> They talk about slow moving projectiles...a .45 is considered slow moving, >> which is why it is ineffective against body armor but it more efficiently >> releases it's energy than say the faster moving 9mm which is why the .45 > is >> more effecting at knocking back your opponent. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Judah McAuley [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 6:29 PM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment >> >> >> Yes, a 45 is a penetrating bullet, it is not like a rubber bullet or >> bean bag projectile. Please just go back and read the damn thing you >> quoted again, it actually explains it. >> >> Judah > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:322937 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
