On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "My point is that it's not communism, it's our 'nature'."
>
> Maybe to some extent.  But what makes that nature grow at an exponential
> rate and kill 20 millions verses a village?

Not communism.  Nor it's ideals.

"Treating" communism is like treating a symptom-- where a better
solution, is getting rid of stagnant pools of water, so to speak.

Addressing our animal traits, maybe.  We've been making progress--
much as some folk think the only answer is God.

> "I'm saying that I don't see this as a reflection on/of communism.  Or the
> 'ideal' of communism, if you prefer."
>
> You're right.  It is not the ideal.  "From each according to his ability, to
> each according to his need"  sounds great.  It just doesn't work.  It cannot
> take into account human nature, mainly greed and self-interest.

Sort of like the Tea Party Contract you posted, neh?

Rather simplistic logic, that just doesn't work at our current level
of evolution/enlightenment.

> "That was a theme I enjoyed from 'the Celestine Prophesy'-- the idea that
> we're supposed to learn from those Native American Commies who 'pulled it
> off', so to speak."
>
> It was probably easier to pull off in small tribes where a unjust leader
> could be slain by an up and coming warrior.

Maybe.

I think there's something to learn from everything.  Especially some stuff.

...
> "Just a silly way of saying that Communism and Socialism aren't
> interchangeable"
>
> No they aren't.  Wasn't my intention.  They come from the same root though.
> They both assert that goods and services produced by an economy should be
> owned publicly, and controlled and planned by a centralized organization.

Everything comes from the same root, if you follow the branches back
long enough.  Or so they say.

Who do you think owns the land?

> "Eh.  Responsibility is an odd deal.  How long is the chain?"
>
> Great question.  Comes up all of the time all over the political spectrum,
> especially in race reparations.

It's a doozy.  Like the question of ownership.

Especially fun is Intellectual Property.

>
> "If I buy shoes from someplace that buys shoes from someplace that buys
> shoes from sweat shops... Do I give a damn?"
>
> Kind of like a hamburger.  Do you really want to think about where it came
> from while you're eating it?

I don't know if it's a matter of want.  I think about the number of
roaches and rat poop that is allowed by the FDA whenever I eat
anything.

The animal in me thinks ignorance is bliss, but the more enlightened
bits would rather know.

But really know, vs. attributing observed behavior X to the Gods, or, Communism.

:Den

-- 
It is not death, it is dying that alarms me.
Michel

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:326284
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to