Notice what I said and how I said it: "I could use such terms as ignorant right-wing conservative asshole, but I have considerably more class than to descend into personal attack."
This is in response to a personal attack on me. I stated that I had specifically refrained from saying such. There is a considerable difference. -- Larry C. Lyons ColdFusion/Web Developer Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer EBStor.com 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204 Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795 tel: (703) 393-7930 fax: (703) 393-2659 Web: http://www.ebstor.com http://www.pacel.com email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. -- > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 4:35 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol > > > Here is Larry's original statement > > > From: "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 13:20:35 -0400 > > To: Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Bush's Mid East Policy > > > > Since when did personal insults become the highlight of > this mailing > > list? Have I called you any insulting names? Then why the > "Chardonnay > > sippers" referent? > > > > I could use such terms as ignorant right-wing conservative asshole, > > but I have considerably more class than to descend into personal > > attack. > > > > On that note, one thing I have noticed is that those who > are right of > > center have a greater tendency to indulge in attacking the person > > rather than the ideas. I think that is very indicative of the > > intellectual bankruptcy of the American right wing. > > > > larry > > Larry didn't actually call me one he just mentioned that he could. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:23 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol > > I don't have the time to continue this conversation, but the > only reference > I could find is that I mentioned the hypocracy of it when you find it > perfectly acceptible to engage in personal attack but take > exception wwhen > are handled the same. > > -- > Larry C. Lyons > ColdFusion/Web Developer > Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer > EBStor.com > 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204 > Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795 > tel: (703) 393-7930 > fax: (703) 393-2659 > Web: http://www.ebstor.com > http://www.pacel.com > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. > -- > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 4:05 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol > > > > > > Sorry Larry, even Beth remembers that one. I don't save my > > email from this list as we have a quota here. > > > > <cf_snip_from_Beth> > > This liberal pansy felt strongly that Larry calling you a > > conservative asshole was completely uncalled for, but I do > > recall in the conversation the name calling went both ways, no? > > </cf_snip_from_Beth> > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Larry Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:00 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol > > > > I never called you such. Please produce the email in full > > quote. Do not put > > words into my mouth. > > > > -- > > Larry C. Lyons > > ColdFusion/Web Developer > > Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer > > EBStor.com > > 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204 > > Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795 > > tel: (703) 393-7930 > > fax: (703) 393-2659 > > Web: http://www.ebstor.com > > http://www.pacel.com > > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. > > -- > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:34 PM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol > > > > > > > > > I wasn't saying you were stating your political ideology, but > > > rather you seem to tear down people and yell at them when the > > > make fun of or call someone a name, such as a "liberal > > > pansy". I didn't see you yell at Larry when he called me a > > > "conservative a**hole". I am just pointing out your > > > inconsistencies in regards to who you yell at, and they all > > > happen to be cases where a person who has a conservative view > > > point calling someone with a liberal view point a name or > > > criticizing their ideology in a manner you deem rude or > > > crude, rather than in all cases, which to me seems hypocritical. > > > > > > > > > Kevin > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:58 PM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol > > > > > > Kevin- > > > > > > I was not stating my political ideology. > > > > > > Nate appears to be new to the list. > > > > > > I was careful in my post to Nate to point out the > > > divergent views on the list and the tradition of not > > > calling names. > > > > > > If you want to call me a hypocrite, you are entitled to > > > your opinion. I am entitled to mine. > > > > > > -Ben > > > > > > > Ben, > > > > > > > > ostracize > > > > > > > > v 1: expel from a community or group [syn: banish, ban, > > > shun, cast out, > > > > blackball] > > > > > > > > 2: avoid speaking to or dealing with; "Ever since I spoke > > > up, my colleagues > > > > ostracize me" [syn: ostracise] > > > > Source: WordNet � 1.6, � 1997 Princeton University > > > > > > > > I seem to remember that when I called Larry a particular > > > name you said you would > > > > no longer read any of my emails. Please read number 2 > > from above. > > > > > > > > Once again, I question who you "call out" when a particular > > > name is leveled > > > > against someone who shares your political ideology. If you > > > really mean what you > > > > say you would act out accordingly when the shoe is on the > > > other foot and someone > > > > who shares your ideology levels a name at someone who doesn't. > > > > > > > > PS Since you are so good at looking up words in the > > > dictionary, try this one: > > > > hypocrite. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:30 PM > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol > > > > > > > > Kevin- > > > > > > > > Main Entry: os�tra�cism > > > > Pronunciation: '�s-tr&-"si-z&m > > > > Function: noun > > > > Date: 1588 > > > > 1 : a method of temporary banishment by popular vote > > > > without trial or special accusation practiced in ancient > > > > Greece > > > > 2 : exclusion by general consent from common privileges > > > > or social acceptance > > > > > > > > I am not ostracizing anyone. > > > > > > > > I have not sought banishment or exclusion of Nate, I > > > > asked him not to call names. > > > > > > > > -Ben > > > > > > > > > Ben, > > > > > > > > > > I think we both know, that the name calling has gone both > > > ways on this > > > > > list. I myself have been guilty of it, however I have > > > yet to see you > > > > > ostracize someone when the person guilty of the name > calling was > > > > > pointing it in the direction of someone with a more > > > conservative view > > > > > point. > > > > > > > > > > Kevin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:17 PM > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > Subject: Re: Librals Suck ~ lol > > > > > > > > > > Nate- > > > > > > > > > > Where do you get off calling names ("pansy liberals")? > > > > > > > > > > We have a strong tradition on this list of agreeing to > > > > > disagree, but respecting each others' opinions. > > > > > > > > > > Some of the people on this lists are liberals, some are > > > > > moderates, some are conservatives. > > > > > > > > > > We have some lively discussions, but not name-calling. > > > > > > > > > > Also, your venting might benefit from use of a spell > > > > > checker. > > > > > > > > > > -Ben > > > > > > > > > > > Regardless, charges would need to be brought forward > > > for such a case > > > > > to be > > > > > > brought to court. If consensual, who is filling > the charges ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Your parents against your gf or bf ? I guess you > > > should have payed > > > > > more > > > > > > attention to their rules. Also - likely this would be > > > dropped, and if > > > > > not - > > > > > > sentanced with a probation or community service, as > > > minors wouldn't be > > > > > > charged as adults for such an act. > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > From: "Beth F" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:22 AM > > > > > > Subject: Re: Librals Suck ~ lol > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmmm, how old where you and your girlfriend when > > > ....? Both over > > > > > 18? > > > > > > > > Even if it was consensual, I presume it was :), was > > > it legal? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most states in the US have a consensual age of 16. > > > This means that > > > > > an > > > > > > adult > > > > > > > can't have sex with anyone under this age legally. It > > > does NOT mean > > > > > that > > > > > > two > > > > > > > 14 year olds doing it is illegal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
