Woohoooo.....I am a genius now. I needed something this morning to liven me up. Thanks Mike. Your right I can't read, and I can't write. I just sit here and randomly hit keys. I guess my luck is just incredible. I don't hide behind my computer. How would I see the monitor? I would be happy to debate you face to face, I love to debate on here, just ask anyone. It's one of my favorite things to do, although I doubt you would last more than a few minutes. In fact I'll prove it to you. Pick an issue, any issue, and I'll go toe to toe with you right here, right now. But remember you have to be intellectually honest. Can you do that?
Me sits and waits, but thinks I'll be waiting for quite awhile. Good morning to the rest of the list! Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Michael Haggerty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 9:49 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol Hey genius, Learn to read and you might be able to piss me off. I wonder if you would be so eager to 'debate' other people at this level if you did not have a computer to hide behind. Something tells me no... Get a life, M -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 4:59 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol No. Michael, I never stated Ben had a viewpoint or an agenda. I merely stated he didn't react the same way to everyone and offered an explanation for what I thought was the reason why. And I hate people that nit pick, (which you said you don't do in one sentence and then go on and do to me, so maybe you should look up hypocritical in the dictionary as well), other peoples grammar or understanding of the English language and then can't even run a friggin' spell check on their own messages. Maybe you should look up how to spell conservative. It's great day when I can piss off more than one person! Especially, opps I almost called someone a name, like you. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Haggerty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:53 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol Kevin, I am not interested in explaining everything to you or in nitpicking every comment anyone on this list has ever made. You said Ben is selective in who he will criticize for 'etiquitte' based on their political beliefs. That statement implies Ben has an agenda in his comments to this list. For that matter, you called it concervative. In this case, I used 'agenda' as a synonym for 'viewpoint', which was the original language you used. The word is more precise and (I am making an assumption here) in keeping with the meaning of your original comment. Many people have agendas which are easy to discern. An obvious one you may be familiar with is the agenda Douglas Adams' puts forth in his Dilbert comic strip. He is anti-stupid people. That being said, please spend more time reading that dictionary you are so fond of before attacking me over my ability to understand the written word. M -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:54 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol I never said he had an agenda, but rather merely pointed out that he hadn't reacted the same when the shoe was on the other foot. I personally am not against the death penalty, but I would be more persuaded to see someone suffer life in prison, if I saw them truly suffering, rather than watching cable TV and playing sports, working out etc. I think prisoners have way too many luxuries these days. Of course we won't bother to get into the hypocrisy of supporting abortion and being against the death penalty and vice-versa. I once saw a bumper stickers on a car that said: "Meat is Murder" and "Pro-Choice" <cf_gross_point> I wanted to ask the driver if I ate aborted fetuses if it would be wrong? </cf_gross_point> -----Original Message----- From: Michael Haggerty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:27 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol In Ben's defense, capital punishment is the ultimate conservative viewpoint. I have trouble seeing an agenda in his comments. Let's all play nice... some of us are active in anti-death penalty causes and prefer not to be referred to as pansies. One could argue the real pansies are people whose insecurities rule them to the point the need to see others die to have a sense of justice in this world. M -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:21 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol Ben, I think we both know, that the name calling has gone both ways on this list. I myself have been guilty of it, however I have yet to see you ostracize someone when the person guilty of the name calling was pointing it in the direction of someone with a more conservative view point. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:17 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Librals Suck ~ lol Nate- Where do you get off calling names ("pansy liberals")? We have a strong tradition on this list of agreeing to disagree, but respecting each others' opinions. Some of the people on this lists are liberals, some are moderates, some are conservatives. We have some lively discussions, but not name-calling. Also, your venting might benefit from use of a spell checker. -Ben > Regardless, charges would need to be brought forward for such a case to be > brought to court. If consensual, who is filling the charges ? > > Your parents against your gf or bf ? I guess you should have payed more > attention to their rules. Also - likely this would be dropped, and if not - > sentanced with a probation or community service, as minors wouldn't be > charged as adults for such an act. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Beth F" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:22 AM > Subject: Re: Librals Suck ~ lol > > > > ----- > > > > > > Hmmm, how old where you and your girlfriend when ....? Both over 18? > > > Even if it was consensual, I presume it was :), was it legal? > > > > > > > Most states in the US have a consensual age of 16. This means that an > adult > > can't have sex with anyone under this age legally. It does NOT mean that > two > > 14 year olds doing it is illegal. > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
