My point was that a library does not store pornographic materials. I pay for my library through taxes. Just as we don't spend tax dollars on filling the library shelves with porn we should not provide access to porn either. What if all the machines are tied up with porno surfers while others can't do legitimate research? What if my kid is walking by a machine that has porn on the screen? I'm sorry, but my taxes should not be used for this nonsense.
Maybe all libraries should have a separate porn room for that kind of thing but leave the rest of us out of it. Howie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:46 AM Subject: RE: First Amendment Wins Again > You are not being forced to look at it. Equal access. Porn filters also > filter out such important sites as breast cancer information, artwork, > political sites (e.g., net nanny edited out the Democratic and Republican > National Party sites), etc. Not just some site that shows some t and A. > > Who decides what is acceptable and what is not. What about political beliefs > or unpopular opinions. Are they to be censored next? > > larry > > -- > Larry C. Lyons > ColdFusion/Web Developer > Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer > EBStor.com > 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204 > Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795 > tel: (703) 393-7930 > fax: (703) 393-2659 > Web: http://www.ebstor.com > http://www.pacel.com > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. > -- > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
