At the moment, that question feels like "Would you like to be raped by the camel, the horse or the bull". Bush is not the most diplomatic of people (or smartest for that matter) but his ideas on defense, security and response are better than what we would have had with Gore. He'd have had us negotiating with bin ladin rather than bombing him to hell. Nader just isn't worth mentioning in an intelligent conversation after his actions during the election. For good or ill, we have Bush and we'll have the opportunity to keep him in or kick him out at the next election (unless there's a war). Personally, I'll vote for Guliani. ;)
At 04:35 PM 6/4/02, you wrote: >Cool. What constitutional rights do you feel have eroded? > >Would you have preferred Al Gore or Ralph Nader? > >-----Original Message----- >From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:31 PM >To: CF-Community >Subject: RE: Bush dismisses warning > >At 04:12 PM 6/4/02, Kevin wrote: >>If we were to discuss issues what issue would you take issue with the >>most. :) > >Erosion of constitutional rights is probably my hot button, with >environmental policy a close second. > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
