I suspect their reply will be that using bigoted language does not make someone a racist. They have very specific definition of racist - which changes to whatever they want it to mean whenever they want to defend one of their ...er....racists.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: > > I recall folks on this list who have repeatedly jumped to Rush > Limbaugh's defense, claiming that there is no evidence that he is > actually a racist. A virulent, homophobic, lying, pill popping, > mysogonystic sack of shit, sure, but not racist! > > Well, Rush has dubbed a new type of Oreo the "Or-Bam-Eo". I suspect > he's just fishing for ratings at this point, but really? Twisted, > uneducated word play about the mixed race President being a type of > Oreo? That is not only offensive, it's fucking pathetic. > > http://jezebel.com/5832037/rush-limbaugh-dubs-new-type-of-oreo-the-or+bam+eo > > So, who would like to jump to his defense now, hmmm? > > Judah ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:341666 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
