Gravity is a law, evolution is a theory. Since evolution has been
tested more successfully and it has much more weight than say
Phlogiston does. Not all theories are created equal.

This from Wiki (I know wiki can be wrong):
Some key phrases:
... ensuring it is probably a good approximation, if not totally correct.
... rather than asserting certainty.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory

Essential criteria
The defining characteristic of a scientific theory is that it makes
falsifiable or testable predictions. The relevance and specificity of
those predictions determine how potentially useful the theory is. A
would-be theory that makes no predictions that can be observed is not
a useful theory. Predictions not sufficiently specific to be tested
are similarly not useful. In both cases, the term "theory" is hardly
applicable.
In practice a body of descriptions of knowledge is usually only called
a theory once it has a minimum empirical basis, according to certain
criteria:

- It is consistent with pre-existing theory, to the extent the
pre-existing theory was experimentally verified, though it will often
show pre-existing theory to be wrong in an exact sense.

- It is supported by many strands of evidence, rather than a single
foundation, ensuring it is probably a good approximation, if not
totally correct.

Non-essential criteria
Additionally, a theory is generally only taken seriously if:

- It is tentative, correctable, and dynamic in allowing for changes as
new facts are discovered, rather than asserting certainty.

- It is among the most parsimonious explanations, sparing in proposed
entities or explanations—commonly referred to as passing the Occam's
razor test. (Since there is no generally accepted objective definition
of parsimony, this is not a strict criteria, but some theories are
much less economical than others.)

This is true of such established theories as special and general
relativity, quantum mechanics, plate tectonics, evolution, etc.
Theories considered scientific meet at least most, but ideally all, of
these extra criteria.

Theories do not have to be perfectly accurate to be scientifically useful.

- The predictions made by Classical mechanics are known to be
inaccurate, but they are sufficiently good approximations in most
circumstances that they are still very useful and widely used in place
of more accurate but mathematically difficult theories.

- In chemistry, there are many acid-base theories which, while
providing highly divergent explanations of what "really" makes acids
acids and bases bases, they are very useful for describing the
phenomenology of certain chemical reactions which fall under the
concept of "acid-base reaction". In a sense, the notion of generalized
acid-base reaction is not precisely defined, and therefore theories
about what gives rise to acid-base chemistry are "inexact";
nonetheless, they are useful scientific theories.

.

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:57 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Because we seek consistency in thought and argument.
>
> If one scientific theory is suspect simply because it contains the word
> "theory"....then all of them are.
>
> The simple fact is that what separates the evolution theory from other
> theories in science is that it has a religious implication. No one doubts
> gravity because falling apples don't challenge people's comfort stories
> about benevolent ghosts.
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Why is it always all or nothing with this group?
>>
>> .
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:17 PM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > ....lest you die thinking gravity doesn't exist, simply because it
>> > is not a "proven fact".
>> >
>>
>>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:342657
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to