"First, I do not have a 'side'." Saying you don't have a side doesn't make it so. Your actions speak louder than your words.
"Second, the 'integrity of the votes cast' being 'suspect' is not enough, by itself, to constitute 'voter fraud'." Unless it effects your side. "Third, I think its bullshit that these people were replaced so late in the game, and with members of the opposing party, but it seems from the 2nd link you posted that the original people will be there." It was bullshit and hopefully the court appointed judges will be let back in. Still doesn't make it right. Anything that threatens the integrity of the vote should result in significant jail time. "Lastly, how does having republicans instead of democrats in those positions protect the integrity of the votes being cast? I would think there would, at the very least, be members of both parties present." Really? I think you can figure that one out on your own. J - Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power. - Benjamin Franklin ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:357702 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
