You're in rare form, I dig it. On Jan 10, 2013 9:53 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > prov·o·ca·tion > /ËprävÉËkÄSHÉn/ > Noun > Action or speech that provokes someone, esp. deliberately. > Action or speech held to be likely to prompt physical retaliation. > Synonyms > incitement - instigation - challenge > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > And there you go again with that reich wing crap. > > > > It does not help your argument, and makes you sound like a partisan > asshat. > > > > Please stop with that. > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> > >> this is sure to get amore than a few reich wing heads to explode. > >> After King Philip's War in the 168o's through to the immediate pre > >> revolutionary era, many communities owned the rifles and large > >> equipment communally. So that everyone was fully equipped the same > >> regardless of wealth. > >> > >> Those darned colonial Socialists. > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Eric Roberts > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > And 240 years ago, things were A LOT different than they were today. > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: LRS Scout [mailto:[email protected]] > >> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 3:33 PM > >> > To: cf-community > >> > Subject: Re: Possible Executive Action - Gun Control > >> > > >> > > >> > Exactly. The militia carried what they owned, down even to food and > >> ammo. > >> > If you wanted a cannon, some individual had to buy and maintain it. > >> > > >> > So this all comes down to the intent of the founders. The > >> constitutionality > >> > or legality of a gun law has nothing at all to do with polls or modern > >> crime > >> > statistics, and everything to do with the authors intent over 200 > years > >> ago, > >> > as that is what was ratified and carries the power of law today. > >> > On Jan 10, 2013 4:28 PM, "Jerry Barnes" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> "I would say it means that in order to have a well regulated militia > >> >> (aka laws about the militia and it's use are constitutional) you need > >> >> an armed population, and therefore the right of the individual to own > >> >> and carry arms shall be in no way limited." > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> When the Constitution was written, how were militia formed? Who > >> >> provided the weapons? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> J > >> >> > >> >> - > >> >> > >> >> Fascism and Communism are merely variants of the same totalitarianism > >> >> which central control of economic activity tends to produce. - F. A. > >> >> Hayek > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:360019 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
