Well, that is certainly your right But I don't like it. So I am going to add you to my kill file for now
I just don't have the patience for people who are confrontational as a basic approach. It isn't worth my time or aggrevation. On Thursday, January 10, 2013, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > > IN other words I used it quite deliberately like that. Would it have > soothed your irritable feeling if I had said, this may make more than > a few heads explode... > > The point being is that most would go meh or at the most would think > that's a tiny bit cool. The ones that would take offense need the > irritation. When they realize that the founders were not the stalwart > right wing fantasies that they are considered. > > Besides what is wrong with the word Reich. It fits. > > "Empire" is the correct translation of Reich. > Das Erste Reich is the Holy Roman Empire > Das Zweiter Reich is the German Empire of Wilhem I/II > Das Dritte Reich is "Gross Deutschland" Greater Germany of the Hitler > regime. > > The same folks I call reich wingers attempted to create an American > Empire so the phrase fits. > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Larry C. Lyons > <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > prov·o·ca·tion > > /ËprävÉËkÄSHÉn/ > > Noun > > Action or speech that provokes someone, esp. deliberately. > > Action or speech held to be likely to prompt physical retaliation. > > Synonyms > > incitement - instigation - challenge > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson > > <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > >> > >> And there you go again with that reich wing crap. > >> > >> It does not help your argument, and makes you sound like a partisan > asshat. > >> > >> Please stop with that. > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Larry C. Lyons > >> <[email protected]<javascript:;> > >wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> this is sure to get amore than a few reich wing heads to explode. > >>> After King Philip's War in the 168o's through to the immediate pre > >>> revolutionary era, many communities owned the rifles and large > >>> equipment communally. So that everyone was fully equipped the same > >>> regardless of wealth. > >>> > >>> Those darned colonial Socialists. > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Eric Roberts > >>> <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > And 240 years ago, things were A LOT different than they were today. > >>> > > >>> > -----Original Message----- > >>> > From: LRS Scout [mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;>] > >>> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 3:33 PM > >>> > To: cf-community > >>> > Subject: Re: Possible Executive Action - Gun Control > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Exactly. The militia carried what they owned, down even to food and > >>> ammo. > >>> > If you wanted a cannon, some individual had to buy and maintain it. > >>> > > >>> > So this all comes down to the intent of the founders. The > >>> constitutionality > >>> > or legality of a gun law has nothing at all to do with polls or > modern > >>> crime > >>> > statistics, and everything to do with the authors intent over 200 > years > >>> ago, > >>> > as that is what was ratified and carries the power of law today. > >>> > On Jan 10, 2013 4:28 PM, "Jerry Barnes" > >>> > <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> > >>> >> "I would say it means that in order to have a well regulated militia > >>> >> (aka laws about the militia and it's use are constitutional) you > need > >>> >> an armed population, and therefore the right of the individual to > own > >>> >> and carry arms shall be in no way limited." > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> When the Constitution was written, how were militia formed? Who > >>> >> provided the weapons? > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> J > >>> >> > >>> >> - > >>> >> > >>> >> Fascism and Communism are merely variants of the same > totalitarianism > >>> >> which central control of economic activity tends to produce. - F. A. > >>> >> Hayek > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:360028 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
