\m/

Party on Garth!
On Jan 10, 2013 9:59 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Well right now I'm too burned out to think straight. have an excellent
> night all.
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:54 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > You're in rare form, I dig it.
> > On Jan 10, 2013 9:53 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> prov·o·ca·tion
> >> /ˌprävəˈkāSHən/
> >> Noun
> >> Action or speech that provokes someone, esp. deliberately.
> >> Action or speech held to be likely to prompt physical retaliation.
> >> Synonyms
> >> incitement - instigation - challenge
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > And there you go again with that reich wing crap.
> >> >
> >> > It does not help your argument, and makes you sound like a partisan
> >> asshat.
> >> >
> >> > Please stop with that.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Larry C. Lyons <
> [email protected]
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> this is sure to get amore than a few reich wing heads to explode.
> >> >> After King Philip's War in the 168o's through to the immediate pre
> >> >> revolutionary era, many communities owned the rifles and large
> >> >> equipment communally. So that everyone was fully equipped the  same
> >> >> regardless of wealth.
> >> >>
> >> >> Those darned colonial Socialists.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Eric Roberts
> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > And 240 years ago, things were A LOT different than they were
> today.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> >> > From: LRS Scout [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> >> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 3:33 PM
> >> >> > To: cf-community
> >> >> > Subject: Re: Possible Executive Action - Gun Control
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Exactly.  The militia carried what they owned, down even to food
> and
> >> >> ammo.
> >> >> > If you wanted a cannon, some individual had to buy and maintain it.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > So this all comes down to the intent of the founders.  The
> >> >> constitutionality
> >> >> > or legality of a gun law has nothing at all to do with polls or
> modern
> >> >> crime
> >> >> > statistics, and everything to do with the authors intent over 200
> >> years
> >> >> ago,
> >> >> > as that is what was ratified and carries the power of law today.
> >> >> > On Jan 10, 2013 4:28 PM, "Jerry Barnes" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> "I would say it means that in order to have a well regulated
> militia
> >> >> >> (aka laws about the militia and it's use are constitutional) you
> need
> >> >> >> an armed population, and therefore the right of the individual to
> own
> >> >> >> and carry arms shall be in no way limited."
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> When the Constitution was written, how were militia formed?  Who
> >> >> >> provided the weapons?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> J
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> -
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Fascism and Communism are merely variants of the same
> totalitarianism
> >> >> >> which central control of economic activity tends to produce. - F.
> A.
> >> >> >> Hayek
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:360024
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to