It fits and infuriates all at once.

I'm at the point where agitation seems to gain as many converts as direct
argument.
On Jan 10, 2013 9:58 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> IN other words I used it quite deliberately like that. Would it have
> soothed your irritable feeling if I had said, this may make more than
> a few heads explode...
>
> The point being is that most would go meh or at the most would think
> that's a tiny bit cool. The ones that would take offense need the
> irritation. When they realize that the founders were not the stalwart
> right wing fantasies that they are considered.
>
> Besides what is wrong with the word Reich. It fits.
>
> "Empire" is the correct translation of Reich.
> Das Erste Reich is the Holy Roman Empire
> Das Zweiter Reich is the German Empire of Wilhem I/II
> Das Dritte Reich is "Gross Deutschland" Greater Germany of the Hitler
> regime.
>
> The same folks I call reich wingers attempted to create an American
> Empire so the phrase fits.
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > prov·o·ca·tion
> > /ˌprävəˈkāSHən/
> > Noun
> > Action or speech that provokes someone, esp. deliberately.
> > Action or speech held to be likely to prompt physical retaliation.
> > Synonyms
> > incitement - instigation - challenge
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> And there you go again with that reich wing crap.
> >>
> >> It does not help your argument, and makes you sound like a partisan
> asshat.
> >>
> >> Please stop with that.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> this is sure to get amore than a few reich wing heads to explode.
> >>> After King Philip's War in the 168o's through to the immediate pre
> >>> revolutionary era, many communities owned the rifles and large
> >>> equipment communally. So that everyone was fully equipped the  same
> >>> regardless of wealth.
> >>>
> >>> Those darned colonial Socialists.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Eric Roberts
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > And 240 years ago, things were A LOT different than they were today.
> >>> >
> >>> > -----Original Message-----
> >>> > From: LRS Scout [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 3:33 PM
> >>> > To: cf-community
> >>> > Subject: Re: Possible Executive Action - Gun Control
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Exactly.  The militia carried what they owned, down even to food and
> >>> ammo.
> >>> > If you wanted a cannon, some individual had to buy and maintain it.
> >>> >
> >>> > So this all comes down to the intent of the founders.  The
> >>> constitutionality
> >>> > or legality of a gun law has nothing at all to do with polls or
> modern
> >>> crime
> >>> > statistics, and everything to do with the authors intent over 200
> years
> >>> ago,
> >>> > as that is what was ratified and carries the power of law today.
> >>> > On Jan 10, 2013 4:28 PM, "Jerry Barnes" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >> "I would say it means that in order to have a well regulated militia
> >>> >> (aka laws about the militia and it's use are constitutional) you
> need
> >>> >> an armed population, and therefore the right of the individual to
> own
> >>> >> and carry arms shall be in no way limited."
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> When the Constitution was written, how were militia formed?  Who
> >>> >> provided the weapons?
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> J
> >>> >>
> >>> >> -
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Fascism and Communism are merely variants of the same
> totalitarianism
> >>> >> which central control of economic activity tends to produce. - F. A.
> >>> >> Hayek
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:360023
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to