that is exactly why I use it. On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:13 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > It fits and infuriates all at once. > > I'm at the point where agitation seems to gain as many converts as direct > argument. > On Jan 10, 2013 9:58 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> IN other words I used it quite deliberately like that. Would it have >> soothed your irritable feeling if I had said, this may make more than >> a few heads explode... >> >> The point being is that most would go meh or at the most would think >> that's a tiny bit cool. The ones that would take offense need the >> irritation. When they realize that the founders were not the stalwart >> right wing fantasies that they are considered. >> >> Besides what is wrong with the word Reich. It fits. >> >> "Empire" is the correct translation of Reich. >> Das Erste Reich is the Holy Roman Empire >> Das Zweiter Reich is the German Empire of Wilhem I/II >> Das Dritte Reich is "Gross Deutschland" Greater Germany of the Hitler >> regime. >> >> The same folks I call reich wingers attempted to create an American >> Empire so the phrase fits. >> >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > prov·o·ca·tion >> > /ËprävÉËkÄSHÉn/ >> > Noun >> > Action or speech that provokes someone, esp. deliberately. >> > Action or speech held to be likely to prompt physical retaliation. >> > Synonyms >> > incitement - instigation - challenge >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> And there you go again with that reich wing crap. >> >> >> >> It does not help your argument, and makes you sound like a partisan >> asshat. >> >> >> >> Please stop with that. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> this is sure to get amore than a few reich wing heads to explode. >> >>> After King Philip's War in the 168o's through to the immediate pre >> >>> revolutionary era, many communities owned the rifles and large >> >>> equipment communally. So that everyone was fully equipped the same >> >>> regardless of wealth. >> >>> >> >>> Those darned colonial Socialists. >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Eric Roberts >> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> > And 240 years ago, things were A LOT different than they were today. >> >>> > >> >>> > -----Original Message----- >> >>> > From: LRS Scout [mailto:[email protected]] >> >>> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 3:33 PM >> >>> > To: cf-community >> >>> > Subject: Re: Possible Executive Action - Gun Control >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > Exactly. The militia carried what they owned, down even to food and >> >>> ammo. >> >>> > If you wanted a cannon, some individual had to buy and maintain it. >> >>> > >> >>> > So this all comes down to the intent of the founders. The >> >>> constitutionality >> >>> > or legality of a gun law has nothing at all to do with polls or >> modern >> >>> crime >> >>> > statistics, and everything to do with the authors intent over 200 >> years >> >>> ago, >> >>> > as that is what was ratified and carries the power of law today. >> >>> > On Jan 10, 2013 4:28 PM, "Jerry Barnes" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >>> >> "I would say it means that in order to have a well regulated militia >> >>> >> (aka laws about the militia and it's use are constitutional) you >> need >> >>> >> an armed population, and therefore the right of the individual to >> own >> >>> >> and carry arms shall be in no way limited." >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> When the Constitution was written, how were militia formed? Who >> >>> >> provided the weapons? >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> J >> >>> >> >> >>> >> - >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Fascism and Communism are merely variants of the same >> totalitarianism >> >>> >> which central control of economic activity tends to produce. - F. A. >> >>> >> Hayek >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:360032 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
