sneaky coupled with blatant. two different things. seems ok to me
conceptually.



On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:34 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> >
> > But what would happen is that it throws much greater weight
> > to republican controlled districts (which coupled with the recent sneaky
> > redistricting attempt) makes this a blatant power grab.
> >
> >
> How can you be both "sneaky" and "blatant" ???  :)
>
> --
> Wake up to find out that you
> Are the eyes of the world
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:360440
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to