On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Because then heterosexual and homosexual couples would have he same
> rights.
> > Right now, they do not.
> >
>
> They should have the same rights under a civil union, nobody is disputing
> that. You're just trying to redefine a word.
>

No, I am not. I am trying to make it so homosexuals enjoy the same benefits
I do, including being able to say they are 'married'


>
>
> > I have a hangup? I am not the one who wants to deny something to one
> group
> > of people simply because I find them 'icky'. Funny how people will argue
> > against homosexuals getting 'married' claim those that say 'civil unions'
> > are not the same ate 'hung up' on a word.>
> >
>
> Again, you don't understand the discussion we're having. Nobody mentioned
> icky except you.
>


>
> If civil unions truly were 'equal', why give it a different name?
> >
>
> It has a different meaning. Rights aren't based on a word. If people have
> equality it doesn't matter what the term used is.
>

You are saying it is 'equal' but its also 'different' . Make up your mind
Sam, it cannot be both.

>
>
> Well, then, enlighten me.
> >
> >
> It'll be too difficult. It seems you've become a born-again liberal too
> radicalized to realize there are two sides to a discussion. I'll wait until
> the Kool-Aid wears off.
>

I realize there are two sides to this discussion (more than 2 probably).


>
>
>
> > How is it not discrimination when you allow something to one group that
> is
> > denied to another solely based on their sexual orientation?
> >
>
> Now it's a club and membership is denied? You're distorting.
>

I am not distorting anything - there are benefits afforded to heterosexual
couples that are not afforded to homosexual couples solely based on their
sexual preference.

You keep dodging the question. How is this NOT discrimination?


>
>
> I have heard a lot of opponents of gay marriage argue that homosexuality is
> > a 'sin', yet I have not heard one of these people argue against thieves,
> > murderers or atheists getting married. What is so special about the 'sin'
> > of loving another human being who happens to be of the same sex that
> people
> > are so hung up on?
> >
>
> And yet another straw man, can you stay focused? Did I ever say that?
>

Where did I say you said that? Was simply offering other commentary.

>
> --
Scott Stroz
---------------
You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can wonder
what the f*&k happened. - Cpt. Phil Harris

http://xkcd.com/386/


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365046
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to