On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > To use a word. In reality, to change the definition of a word. Check all > > the dictionaries. > > > Yes, to use a word. But, not just any word, a word that represents a loving > dedication to one another. A word that says, I want this person in my life > for the rest of my life. A word that is supposed to demonstrate a life long > commitment to each other. Funny, Kim Kardashian say say she got 'married' > even though it only lasted a month, but a gay couple who have been together > for decades, cannot. That is what I and others are saying. > > Civil Union doesn't mean all that? Again, check the dictionaries. > No I am not. You said civil unions were equal, but marriage has a different > meaning (maybe I misunderstood). If civil unions are 'equal' how can they > have a different meaning from 'marriage' Help me understand. > > I didn't say they are, I said they should be and that is where the fight should be. Marriage does have a different meaning and it's not the only way to express unconditional love and commitment yada yada yada. > > I realize there are two sides to this discussion (more than 2 probably). > > > > > > > > But you don't respect the other side. Have I insulted anyone because the > > support same-sex marriage? Has anyone? > > > > Yes, you have. You insulted me multiple times in this thread alone. Have I > insulted anyone? If so, it was purely unintentional. > Not because you support same-sex, but because you seem to detest people that don't agree with you. You did mentioned how you've learned as to imply others aren't there yet. It's insulting. > > I never said it did. Nor should the use of a word be banned by the > constitution, don't you think? > > That's like saying instead of giving black equal rights we should just call them white. That's not a solution, the real solution is to make them equal, not redefine a word. > > You keep dodging the question. How is this NOT discrimination? > You still have not answered this question. is it because you know if you > do, you will sound like a homophobic asshole like Cam mentioned earlier? > > > I answered it like three times. You just ignore the answer and keep asking the question. I thought you said you folks didn't insult people against same-sex marriage. The fact that you think there's no answer without being a homophobic asshole is the entire point. of this argument. You folks need to stop being haters. It's always agree with me or else with you non-lefty lefties. But that's ok, get off hating people because you assume they're haters. The irony. . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365055 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
