I am not sure where you got that idea from Sam, I said nothing of the sort.
I do not believe Zimmerman's account of how things went down. It doesn't pass the 'smell test' to me, and, if anyone ever had a reason to lie, it was him in this situation. What I think happened is that he tried to be a tough guy and scare or intimidate Martin and it backfired when Martin defended himself. Pure speculation of course. Again, the only version we heard was Zimmerman's because Martin did not survive the encounter. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > So let's get this straight. You think Zimmerman called the po-po, then > attacked with intent to kill because black, because he learned in school > how to use the law to get away with it? > > . > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Witnesses saw Martin attack Zimmerman, or saw Martin on top of Zimmerman > > after the 'attack' started? > > > > Subtle but important distinction. Just because Martin was on top of him > at > > some point does not mean he 'started it'. It is just as likely that > Martin > > was defending himself from Zimmerman. > > > > It is very easy to create reasonable doubt when the other guy cannot tel > > their side of the story. > > > > I understand he was found 'not guilty' because the law in Florida made it > > pretty much impossible to convict him, but that does not take away from > the > > fact that, after being told not to, he followed (does that word work > > better for you) , shot and killed a minor. > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:16 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > The witnesses? > > > > > > Did git even follow the trial? > > > > > > The girl friend was proven to be lying. > > > > > > The other lady ADMITTED she was lying. Based off what she saw on tv. > > > > > > He fired up, from his back while the kid was on top of him. His head > was > > > smashed into the ground and his nose broken. > > > > > > Finally you yourself just won the case for me. > > > > > > In our system all you need to do is provide a reasonable doubt. There > is > > > more than reasonable doubt > > > On Jul 22, 2013 3:11 PM, "Scott Stroz" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Not true. In some places they are sworn officers. Even so, what he > was > > > told > > > > was sound advice and any reasonable person would have heeded said > > advice. > > > > > > > > How do we know Zimmerman did not 'attack' first? Oh, right...we have > > take > > > > the word of the only one of them who had a gun and used it, and > > > > coincidentally, was the only one to survive the confrontation. It is > > not > > > > like he would have anything to lie about. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:05 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A minor who attacked him? > > > > > > > > > > Yup > > > > > > > > > > Following and questioning people in public, even photographing and > > > > > recording them is totally legal. Dispatchers as you work know > aren't > > > > sworn > > > > > officers and can't TELL you to do a damn thing. > > > > > On Jul 22, 2013 3:02 PM, "Scott Stroz" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's see....he followed Martin in his car, and then, after being > > > told > > > > > not > > > > > > to by the 911 operator, he pursued martin on foot. Sounds like > > > stalking > > > > > to > > > > > > me or maybe it is 'pursuing', either way, he should not have been > > > doing > > > > > > it.. > > > > > > > > > > > > But, that aside....I will amend my original comment - > > > > > > > > > > > > 'Rescuing' 4 people who were uninjured does not negate the fact > > that > > > he > > > > > > shot and killed a minor. > > > > > > > > > > > > Feel better about that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:53 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stalk. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You don't even know what the word means. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've stalked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a ghilie. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From a hide site. With a rifle. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He asked a kid who was loitering in his neighborhood questions > > and > > > > got > > > > > > > assaulted for it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm sick of this unarmed nonsense. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You don't need a weapon to cause grave bodily damage and death. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Shot and killed ill give you. Not stalked. If he had stalked > him > > > he'd > > > > > be > > > > > > in > > > > > > > prison. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trayvon was there long enough for Zimmerman to make phone calls > > and > > > > > shit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm gonna look into shit like that all day every day in my > > > > > neighborhood. > > > > > > > I'm not even neighborhood watch. Trust and believe I don't > need a > > > gun > > > > > to > > > > > > > kill. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Top it off with the cracker shit and I see a racist punk kid > who > > > > made a > > > > > > > realbad decision. > > > > > > > On Jul 22, 2013 2:40 PM, "Scott Stroz" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tim - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you implying that because he was found 'not guilty' that > he > > > did > > > > > not > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > fact stalk, shoot and kill an unarmed person? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never mentioned the verdict, merely the details of the > > > incident. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:19 PM, LRS Scout < > [email protected] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Really? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm pretty sure our judicial system disagreed with you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not even a hung jury. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not guilty. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The cops didn't even want to arrest him, they were made to. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But you know better right? > > > > > > > > > On Jul 22, 2013 2:17 PM, "Scott Stroz" <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He is. 'Rescuing' 4 people with no injuries does not > negate > > > > that > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > fact > > > > > > > > > > that he stalked, shot and killed an unarmed person. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:13 PM, LRS Scout < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What a monster. > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 22, 2013 2:13 PM, "GMoney" <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought this was an Onion headline when i first saw > > > > > it....but > > > > > > > > > > > apparently > > > > > > > > > > > > not! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimmerman-emerged-hiding-rescue-family-trapped-suv/story?id=19735432 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365754 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
