We willingly gave up or rights, as did the old red neck, I have no problem with him being fired, I was trying to make a point that you guys are glazing over for what you want our what the law says as supposed to what should be an individual right, one that is enshrined next to due process and free speech and arms.
The philosophy of liberty is used to deny it at every turn. On May 19, 2014 1:26 PM, "Eric Roberts" <[email protected]> wrote: > > When you are a celebrity...you are not an "individual"...if you were an > "individual" like everyone else, then people like the paparazzi would not > be > able to indiscriminately photograph people and they would get sue for > trespassing, being peeping Toms, etc...things that would protect you and me > against these acts do not apply. He made statements and people connect him > with A&E so if he says stupid shit while he has a running show on A&E, they > can fire him for saying stupid shit. It's just like the restricts soldiers > have while they are in uniform on what they can and cannot do because while > in uniform, they represent their branch of service. > > -----Original Message----- > From: LRS Scout [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 11:30 AM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Houston Pastor Says Religious Freedom Means the Right to > Discriminate Against Gays, Jews > > > That seems like a double standard, he did his job, the interview was as an > individual, that's a pretty steep speech impact especially when you > consider > the number of people employed even at second hand by the government. > On May 19, 2014 12:27 PM, "Judah McAuley" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Of course they should be able to fire him. All contracts in that arena > > are going to have a clause about upholding the standards of the > > network and not bringing any ill repute upon them. You publicly > > embarrass your employer, you aren't doing your job well. Therefore you > get > fired. Pretty easy. > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:21 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > So, A&E should not have been allowed to fire the old red neck? > > > On May 19, 2014 12:20 PM, "Judah McAuley" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I can understand where you are coming from, I just disagree. I > > > > think > > that > > > > jobs are jobs and you should be judged on your ability to do a > > > > job, not > > > any > > > > other criteria. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:370211 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
