The point of the Blaze and twitter posts was to trivialize death. I like to think that you somehow didn't get that and were looking at "statistic in error", because I think of you as a good person. Go back and read. That is not how you discuss statistics in error.
And I don't take "I apologize if you were offended" as an apology. Judah On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:10 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I'm happy to discuss whether or not a statistic was properly categorized, > > but don't you ever, ever, trivialize the death of a child. This is some > of > > the most nauseating crap I've ever read and I really want to see an > > apology. > > > > My take on this is that the Bloomberg group is lumping all of the shootings > together as the same as Sandy Hook. The point of the Blaze & twitter items > and the reason that I linked to them is that they are not. > > I wasn't trying to trivialize their deaths though I can't speak for the > author of the tweets. > > And while I've been subjected to "nauseating crap" on this list in the past > and been berated when I said so, I'll apologize if the resources I used to > better define the digits offended you. > > Until Later! > C. Hatton Humphrey > http://www.eastcoastconservative.com > > Every cloud does have a silver lining. Sometimes you just have to do some > smelting to find it. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:370825 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
