On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:46 AM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote:
> The point of the Blaze and twitter posts was to trivialize death. I like > to think that you somehow didn't get that and were looking at "statistic in > error", because I think of you as a good person. Go back and read. That is > not how you discuss statistics in error. > > And I don't take "I apologize if you were offended" as an apology. > As I said before, I was looking at the statistical aspect of the information and nothing more. Regarding the non-apology (which you're right, it wasn't really one), If I could have found a less offensive source I would have used it. If I had the time I would have typed out the instances but I didn't. So yes, I'll apologize for not taking that time... but I'll also couch that in the statement that I know that there are others that would have questioned the data rather than the tone in which it was presented. Until Later! C. Hatton Humphrey http://www.eastcoastconservative.com Every cloud does have a silver lining. Sometimes you just have to do some smelting to find it. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:370826 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
