If you're going to analogize, at least put it in perspective. Let's say ranchers in CA, TX and AZ constantly fired missiles into Mexico every day. Mexico tells the US government to make them stop or they will fire back and the US did nothing. Then, Mexico called, emailed, texted and dropped leaflets to the houses, churches and schools that were firing the missiles explaining when and where the bombs would land. If the ranchers rallied more people to go to the target sites to die for the cause than that's on the ranchers and the people that showed up at the scheduled time. Unless Mexico went to the sites and checked, how would they know if civilians were there? Then you have to say to yourself, if these people are willing to die to send a message, they are probably willing to strap a bomb on and go to a crowded market so good riddance. But no, the Mexican government sends more notices pleading people to leave the targets at the given times, they use more precise weapons to limit casualties and they still get called the terrorist. It's called propaganda and you are buying into it.
. On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK..so if Mexico launched an attack on the White House and civilians that > lived or worked near the intended target died, Mexico would be absolved of > those deaths as long as they warned us ahead of time? > > And, sorry, but they are still 'people'. maybe not people we like, but > people nonetheless. > > Again, absolutely befuddled this is coming from you. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:371530 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
