I use the word style and not Framework because Fusebox is not so much a
framework. .NET is a framework, Java Classes create a framework.

Fusebox is just way to organize code. To me a Framework implies forced
structure based on restrictions in the language, not restrictions by the
development team.

Obviously Fusebox is not the only way for a large development team to
work on a large application. If it were then everybody would use it.

I am saying that Fusebox fixes many of the problems, for you and your
team, and a number of other teams.

But remember, some ideas and styles do not a framework make. It takes a
lot more than that.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:31 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Throwing the baby back
> 
> Well, everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
> 
> I would argue there are few 'reasonable' coding styles to begin with.
Of
> course, if you have something you are comfortable using and it works
well
> for you you are going to be more productive using it. However, if you
have
> to work in large groups and need to produce code that will be able to
be
> understood by others right now and for a long time to come, a 'style'
> might
> not be the way to go.
> 
> The Fusebox framework presents some good ideas for addressing these
> problems
> in various ways. I do not believe I ever said it fixes these problems,
> just
> that, in the groups I have worked with, it has answered the challenges
I
> noted.
> 
> M
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:14 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Throwing the baby back
> 
> 
> Fusebox its self doesn't fix these problems.
> 
> Any reasonable coding style will fix these problems. I developed my
own
> style because I didn't care much for FuseBox.
> 
> If I ever had time I would write it up so people could see it. But I
> don't have time.
> 
> I don't think anybody would argue that a good set style helps
> development. But many can argue they don't like that one.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:59 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: RE: Throwing the baby back
> >
> >
> >
> > What I get out of using FB is the following:
> >
> > 1) Reduced development time for more work;
> > 2) Understandability of 'behind the scenes' stuff in the code;
> > 3) The ability to share my code with others without having to
explain
> > everything to them / adjust my style to accomodate theirs.
> >
> > I'm sure others could spell out many more advantages, these are just
a
> > few.
> >
> > M
> 
> 
> 
> 
______________________________________________________________________
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to