Well, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I would argue there are few 'reasonable' coding styles to begin with. Of course, if you have something you are comfortable using and it works well for you you are going to be more productive using it. However, if you have to work in large groups and need to produce code that will be able to be understood by others right now and for a long time to come, a 'style' might not be the way to go.
The Fusebox framework presents some good ideas for addressing these problems in various ways. I do not believe I ever said it fixes these problems, just that, in the groups I have worked with, it has answered the challenges I noted. M -----Original Message----- From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:14 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Throwing the baby back Fusebox its self doesn't fix these problems. Any reasonable coding style will fix these problems. I developed my own style because I didn't care much for FuseBox. If I ever had time I would write it up so people could see it. But I don't have time. I don't think anybody would argue that a good set style helps development. But many can argue they don't like that one. > -----Original Message----- > From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:59 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Throwing the baby back > > > > What I get out of using FB is the following: > > 1) Reduced development time for more work; > 2) Understandability of 'behind the scenes' stuff in the code; > 3) The ability to share my code with others without having to explain > everything to them / adjust my style to accomodate theirs. > > I'm sure others could spell out many more advantages, these are just a > few. > > M ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
