Clinton was a sleaze personally, but under him my standard of living markedly improved. Bush has trashed the economy and any hope of peace in the middle east. In my opinion.
Marlon Moyer writes: > Lon Lentz wrote: > > > Logical fallacy. The story has nothing to do with whether there is or > >isn't Al Qaeda involvement. > > > > > > > I see no logical fallacy. It states that this was a goal before > 9/11/2001. Pres. Bush saw a way to move on Iraq under the guise of the > war on terrorism. Iraq has not been exposed to have committed any > terroristic acts, therefore the administration had to make a link from > Iraq to a terrorist organization. Al Caeda just happened to be on the > public's mind at the time. > > > Besides, it's a war on Terrorism, not just Al Qaeda. And the "Regime > >Change" policy for Iraq started under Bill "That Pantload" Clinton....my > >fingers feel dirty just for typing his name.....<shudder> > > > > > > > According to the Nightline story > <url:http://abcnews.go.com/sections/nightline/DailyNews/pnac_030310.html>, > it was started by a conservative group during Clinton's presidency of > which 10 are now part of the current administration. > > As to Clinton, I'm not sure which is worse, a president who screws a few > other women other than his wife, or a president who screws a lot more > people out of money because of his stock sell off. :) > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
