Ok. But that's a loaded question. Tax cuts, when given, should go to everyone who pays taxes. The fact that Enron pays taxes is separate from the fact that Enron committed crimes. And those responsible should go to prison.
What is it about the word "children" that makes it such a powerful trump card? And that if you don't support the "children" than you must want them all dead or something. Reminds me of the PSA that ends, "We're for the children. Whose side are you on?" Implying that you must hate children and want to murder them if you didn't support their cause. -----Original Message----- From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 4:34 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Bush decided to "take out Saddam" in March so it's ok to give tax cuts to enron but not to children? um.... I think I will walk away from this discussion for a little bit. I have work to do, anyway. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
