Isn't this a contradiction of your earlier opposition to tax cuts? I mean, by nature that would free up money into the economy, right?
Here I am only asking. I personally don't believe in the idea of wage based taxes. I think that we can fund our federal government (with drastic cuts in the size and scope of the federal government) with tariffs, maybe a national sales tax. I guess I am saying how drastically things need to change to make it really better for everyone. Tim -----Original Message----- From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 6:48 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Bush decided to "take out Saddam" in March ::nod:: my remark was fairly casual. Still -- I believe the economy is being mishandled. This is a gut impression, and I may change my mind, but that is how I feel. No question internet stocks were overvalued at the end of the nineties, and the market was due for a correction. Nonetheless there is a certain "let them eat cake" aura to current policy; whereas Keynsian theory would call for an infusion of cash. Anyone thinks otherwise, I will listen; but perhaps not agree. > > By the same token I don't see how Jr Bush (or Clinton) could truly be > blamed for the current economic downturn which is clearly a result of an > unrealistic market. > > The point is that regardless of the administration there are an enormous > number of indicators political, technological and social for economic > success or failure. And you can't consider one in isolation as causal. > > Jim Davis > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
